 |
|
Panel:
Balancing Both Sides of the Funding Equation
|
| Pic
courtesy: Mipcom 2005 |
Of
late, many a kid's show, even when greenlit by a broadcaster does
not see the light of the day.
The problem? Falling short of that last 15 to 25% funding of the
budget.
The Solution? Was the topic of discussion in the post lunch session
on Day2 of MIPCOM Junior 2005.
The session 'Balancing Both Sides of the Funding Equation' was
organised in partnership with KidScreen Magazine and was moderated
by Kidscreen News Editor Nancy Lees.
Panelists included Cartoon Network International (UK) SVP Original
Animation & Acquisitions Finn Arnesen, Moonscoop (France) V
P & Executive Producer Nicolas Atlan, Kickback Media (UK) MD
John Bullivant, Canal J Programme Director Pierre Belaisch, Decode
Entertainment Inc (Canada) Partner Neil Court and Teletoon (Canada)
Director of Original Production Madeleine Lévesque.
 |
|
Cartoon
Network's Finn Arnesen and Moonscoop's Nicolas Atlan
|
| Pic
courtesy: Mipcom 2005 |
Broadcaster's
Reality:
Multiple methods for access to content has made things difficult
for broadcasters. They now have to come up with more content, innovative
ideas and overall better quality.
Predicting
what consumers will like is also not an easy business. Which means
that the executive out there in charge of commisioning shows, in
order to be secure, has to lay bets on multiple options. While there
is a finite pipeline that takes content to the consumer, the infinite
options and the pressure to be riding the right horse create chaos
and more content than can be served has already been ordered.
Producer's Pandora:
Firstly its not easy being a content producer. One has to maintain
balance between controlling creativity and thinking commerce even
while astride the roller coaster of managing the production. On
seeing the broadcaster's green lamp, one thought that all had been
achieved and nothing could now stop the show from coming on air
and becoming the next L&M wonder. Alas, there's still a substantial
cavity in the budget that needs to be taken care of.
Now where is the root of the problem?
 |
|
Kidscreen's
Nancy Lees moderated
the session
|
| Pic
courtesy: Mipcom 2005 |
Kickback
Media's (which creates, manages and exploits character based properties
across a range of mediums with the mantra being Character
is King not the Medium) John Bullivant was of the view that
there was an overload of content, "Too much content being produced.
So much content and so less pipeline for it to flow through"
he remarked.
Sharing a broadcaster perspective, Cartoon Network's Finn Arnesen
and Teletoon's Madeleine Lévesque were of the view that a
lot of times the producers weren't doing their homework and needed
to know more about the way the broadcast programming cycle works.
"Increase of demand has seen a lot of content being commisioned.
The chaos is only becuase of lack of knowledge like Who/What/When/Where
and Why" shared Lévesque.
"Producers ought to do their homework and approach us with
shows that fit into our profile" added Arnesen.
Decode Entertainment's Neil Court emphasised that the onus was also
on the broadcaster to guage the producer's capability before saying
yes to a show. Citing the example of the Canadian Broadcasting scene
he pointed out, "Canadian broadcasters before commisioning
a show check out the producer's funding plans and that helps because
then only projects whose producers can see through the entire production
are considered"
Rising Costs
Another
wind which was fueling the fires of funding problems was that of
the rising costs of production. Canal J's Pierre Belaisch pointed
out,"The last 6-7 years have witnessed a lot of upscale in
quality and not only a lot of content going around but production
costs are sky-high and it becomes difficult even for established
producers to do a full series completely on their own"
However Teletoon's Lévesque felt that improved technology
meant more options and cost reduction opportunity."What I see
is the reducing of budgets. Huge choice of possibilities in terms
of design and technology"
"Technology can bring costs down but one still has to pay a
good amount for good story/ voice over and pre production"
shared Arnesen.
 |
|
Decode
Entertainment's Neil Court
and Canal J's Pierre Belaisch
|
| Pic
courtesy: Mipcom 2005 |
Multiple
Partnership Co-Productions
Decode's (which has been doing a lot of Co-Productions) Court said,"In
co productions it is very important that everyone in the partnership
knows the deliverables and benefits for each. There has to be total
transparency otherwise the project gets nowhere. We all have to
agree together, finally the producer's choice to select"
Quite often in co-produced shows in Canada and France, there is
a good share from the funds provided by the respective Governments.
Kickback's Bullivant remarked,"France & Canada have decided
to protect their culture and invest in cultural shows. No incentives
to do anything in UK. No tax credits, no government support. The
money that you get is in the sales you make"
Producers!"Get Financially savvy" / Broadcasters! "If
you have to say no, say it soon"
 |
|
Kickback
Media (UK) MD, John Bullivant
|
| Pic
courtesy: Mipcom 2005 |
Was
that the balancing mantra being sought? Maybe.
Cartoon
Network's Arnesen elaborated,"I am lucky to have a development
fund. We can get scripts and Bibles etc. But finally budgets have
to be in place. A lot of the great pilots made over two years get
commisioned by the broadcasters and then the studios recline that
it cannot get funding. Producers need to get financially savvy"
Teletoon's Lévesque added,"Many a times the biggest
block is when one encounters creative producers without the necessary
business acumen. It is most necessary to have that acumen. There's
a lot of producers who dont pay attention to what broadcasters are
looking for"
"There have been instances where producers keep on investing
time, resource and money on developing projects, simply becuase
the broadcasters need more to see before deciding" retorted
Bullivant, adding that, "Broadcasters have to be honest &
straightfaced. Far better to be told no in the beginning rather
than doing rounds, getting script, pilot plus three or more episodes
and then being told it doesn't work"
Adding more to the topic of business acumen, Moonsccop's Nicolas
Atlan commented,"As the producer you are the manafacturer and
the way you make the money is out of your production. The only way
is to keep much of the production in-house"
What
about discipline?
Bullivant's take: "We are, after all, a manafacturing industry,
we are not disciplined enough becuase we are creative, but that
is not an excuse.Dont do things just based on a creative idea. Controlling
creative instincts is the cornerstone of our business"
What about conviction?
Where there's conviction there's no risk. Why would a producer have
a funding problem if he was deadsure that the show he was making
was good enough? Moonscoop's Atlan stated that," At one time
we can talk about funding, at one time the producer has to believe
in the show and take the risk"
"Another way of approaching it is to turn the system on its
head. You can produce the entire series and then sell it" he
added.
"Pokemon was turned down 4 times before it finally got a nod"
he concluded.
Now, That's the way it is!
|